ASEAN Wraps Digital Economy Pact Negotiations

What Happened

ASEAN officials have concluded negotiations on a digital economy framework agreement, according to The Manila Times and Bombo Radyo Vigan, both reporting on May 31, 2026. The agreement is intended to establish common rules governing cross-border data flows, digital trade, and e-commerce regulation across the Southeast Asian bloc. Separately, the US-ASEAN Business Council (USABC) has urged ASEAN member states to accelerate customs reforms and advance paperless trade, citing risks to regional commerce, per the Manila Bulletin, also published May 31, 2026.

Why It Matters

The conclusion of a regional digital economy pact represents a significant governance milestone for Southeast Asia. The framework would establish shared standards for digital trade across a bloc of over 600 million people, providing a common regulatory foundation for e-commerce and cross-border data flows among member states. The concurrent pressure from the US-ASEAN Business Council on customs reform underscores the broader geopolitical and commercial stakes involved for non-ASEAN trading partners.

The USABC’s call to action — citing specific risks to regional commerce — signals that American business interests are closely watching how ASEAN translates its digital governance ambitions into practical trade facilitation measures, including the modernisation of customs procedures and the shift toward paperless trade systems.

What Might Happen

While negotiations have been completed, formal signing and ratification processes remain ahead, according to the framing provided by The Manila Times. If member states move swiftly to implement the framework, it could accelerate digital trade integration across the region. However, The Manila Times also notes that divergent national regulatory environments may slow domestic adoption of the agreed standards, meaning the pace of real-world implementation could vary significantly across ASEAN economies.

The USABC’s public lobbying, as reported by the Manila Bulletin, suggests that US business groups may continue to apply pressure on member states to align customs modernisation efforts with the digital economy framework — though whether that pressure translates into faster reform timelines remains uncertain.

Venezuela Resumes Dialogue With IMF

What Happened

Venezuela has resumed engagement with the International Monetary Fund through multilateral channels, according to OPI Santa Cruz, which reported the development on 31 May 2026. In a separate report published the same day, Bloomberg Línea confirmed that the IMF Managing Director and Venezuelan authorities have held direct conversations about the country’s economy. The two independent accounts mark a notable shift in the relationship between Caracas and the Fund, which has been largely estranged for years.

Why It Matters

The re-engagement carries substantial policy weight across several dimensions. Venezuela has endured prolonged hyperinflation and severe economic contraction, leaving the country effectively cut off from international credit markets. A renewed relationship with the IMF could open a path toward debt restructuring and macroeconomic stabilisation — outcomes that have eluded the country through years of isolation from multilateral financial institutions. However, any formal IMF programme would almost certainly require structural reforms with direct and potentially painful consequences for public spending, subsidies, and social policy. The stakes are therefore high not only for Venezuela’s macroeconomic trajectory but for the welfare of its population, which has already absorbed years of economic hardship.

What Might Happen

According to the sources cited by OPI Santa Cruz and Bloomberg Línea, talks between Venezuelan authorities and the IMF are at an early stage. If negotiations were to progress, Venezuela could seek a formal IMF programme, which might provide access to credit and a framework for economic stabilisation. However, analysts and officials cited in the sources suggest that domestic political resistance within Venezuela may complicate or delay any agreement. Outstanding governance concerns could also present significant obstacles to reaching a deal acceptable to both the Fund and Caracas. Bloomberg Línea’s reporting indicates that while conversations are under way, no agreement has been announced, and the path from preliminary dialogue to a binding programme remains uncertain. If political and governance hurdles prove difficult to clear, the re-engagement could stall before producing concrete policy outcomes.

EAC Calls Emergency Summit as Ebola Cases Rise

What Happened

The East African Community has called an emergency health summit in response to rising Ebola cases across the region, according to Dawan Africa, reporting on 31 May 2026. The summit convenes as the Democratic Republic of Congo battles a growing Ebola outbreak — a situation the WHO chief has publicly addressed, expressing confidence in the ongoing response effort, per The Voice of Africa, also published 31 May 2026. The two developments, reported independently on the same day, together signal that the outbreak has reached a scale demanding both regional political coordination and international institutional attention.

Why It Matters

A regional Ebola surge carries substantial governance implications that extend well beyond public health. The emergency summit tests the capacity of EAC member states to design and execute coordinated cross-border containment measures — a challenge that has historically exposed gaps in collective response infrastructure across the continent. National healthcare systems in the affected region face compounding strain, and outbreaks of this nature have previously triggered international travel and trade disruptions with cascading economic consequences.

Notably, the WHO chief’s public expression of confidence, issued at the same moment the EAC was convening an emergency health summit, raises questions about the alignment between institutional messaging and the on-the-ground urgency that prompted the summit in the first place. That tension between reassurance and emergency mobilisation is itself a governance signal worth tracking.

What Might Happen

According to the reporting by Dawan Africa on the EAC emergency summit, if member states use the gathering to produce a coordinated regional containment protocol, health authorities may be able to limit cross-border transmission and prevent the outbreak from expanding into additional EAC territories. However, the EAC’s ability to translate summit declarations into operational containment will depend heavily on funding commitments and logistical follow-through — and without those, the outbreak could spread further across the region.

The WHO chief’s expressed confidence, as reported by The Voice of Africa, could prove well-founded if member states move quickly and in concert; the WHO’s public posture suggests the organisation believes the tools for an effective response are available. Conversely, The Voice of Africa’s reporting on the DR Congo outbreak’s continued growth indicates that the situation remains active and unresolved, meaning the WHO and other international organisations may need to escalate their involvement should the regional response prove insufficient.

The coming days may prove critical, according to the trajectory described across both sources: the EAC summit’s outcomes and the DR Congo containment effort will together determine whether this outbreak is brought under control or enters a more severe phase requiring broader international intervention.

{}

Euphrates Floods Knock Out Water Stations in Syria

What Happened

A swelling Euphrates River has flooded homes and farmland across Syria, knocking a water pumping station out of service in eastern Syria, according to Sky News Arabia, which toured the disabled facility. Multiple Arabic-language sources confirm that dams in both Iraq and Syria have filled with water following a decade of drought, marking a rapid and destabilising reversal of conditions across the region. Iraq has begun preparing emergency measures to confront anticipated further flooding along the Euphrates. The flooding was reported on May 31, 2026.

Why It Matters

The destruction of water pumping infrastructure has deepened a drinking water crisis in eastern Syria, directly affecting civilian access to clean water. The disruption compounds humanitarian pressures in a region already strained by years of armed conflict and prolonged drought. As reported by sources covering the Euphrates flooding, the consequences extend beyond inundated homes and farmland, reaching into the basic service systems that communities depend on for survival. The episode illustrates how rapid shifts from drought to flood conditions can overwhelm water governance systems with little warning, leaving infrastructure and populations exposed with minimal time to adapt.

What Might Happen

According to <a href="https://news.google.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

{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “Trump Claims Iran Deal as Tougher Terms Sent to Tehran”, “description”: “Trump claims Iran agreed to no nuclear weapons, but reports say tougher US terms were sent to Tehran, leaving the true state of negotiations unclear.”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/trump-iran-nuclear-deal-tougher-terms-tehran/”, “datePublished”: “2026-05-31T09:46:26Z”, “dateModified”: “2026-05-31T09:46:26Z”, “author”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”, “logo”: {“@type”: “ImageObject”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/logo.png”}}, “mainEntityOfPage”: {“@type”: “WebPage”, “@id”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/trump-iran-nuclear-deal-tougher-terms-tehran/”}, “articleSection”: “Geopolitics”, “keywords”: [“Iran nuclear negotiations”, “Trump Iran deal”, “Strait of Hormuz”, “US foreign policy”, “nuclear non-proliferation”, “global energy markets”, “West Asia”], “about”: [{“@type”: “Thing”, “name”: “Iran nuclear negotiations”}, {“@type”: “Thing”, “name”: “Strait of Hormuz”}, {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “World Bank”}, {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “International Monetary Fund”}, {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “World Trade Organization”}], “mentions”: [{“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Donald Trump”}, {“@type”: “Place”, “name”: “Tehran”}, {“@type”: “Place”, “name”: “Strait of Hormuz”}], “isAccessibleForFree”: true, “inLanguage”: “en”, “copyrightYear”: 2026, “copyrightHolder”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”}}

Trump Claims Iran Deal as Tougher Terms Sent to Tehran

What Happened

US President Donald Trump has publicly claimed that Iran has agreed to have no nuclear weapons, even as reports emerged that tougher terms have been simultaneously sent to Tehran in ongoing negotiations. According to Dawn, the coexistence of Trump’s public declaration of progress and the reported escalation of US demands presents a contradictory and ambiguous picture of where the talks currently stand. The gap between the administration’s public posture and the reported negotiating position has left the true state of the diplomatic process unclear.

Why It Matters

The stakes of these negotiations extend well beyond the bilateral relationship. The World Bank, IMF, and WTO have warned that a US-Iran conflict is already hitting vulnerable economies hardest, underscoring the global economic dimension of the diplomatic impasse, according to Arise News. India’s Finance Ministry has separately identified disruption to the Strait of Hormuz as the single biggest risk to India’s external sector and inflation outlook, according to Moneycontrol. The regional economic fallout is already visible: multiple Asian countries — including Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines, and Myanmar — are experiencing a tourism crisis driven by soaring jet fuel prices and rising travel costs linked to Hormuz-related energy disruptions, according to Travel And Tour World. The outcome of these talks therefore carries direct consequences for regional stability in West Asia, global energy markets, and the broader non-proliferation regime.

What Might Happen

According to Dawn‘s reporting, if the tougher terms sent to Tehran are confirmed and Iran rejects them, analysts warn of a heightened risk of military escalation around the Strait of Hormuz, which could amplify energy price shocks already reverberating across Asian economies through soaring jet fuel prices and rising travel costs. The World Bank, IMF, and WTO have indicated that such a scenario may hit the most vulnerable economies hardest, with spillover effects that could deepen existing tourism and trade pressures across Southeast Asia. Conversely, if Trump’s claim of Iranian agreement reflects a genuine diplomatic breakthrough, it could rapidly de-escalate regional tensions and ease pressure on global energy markets. However, Dawn’s reporting makes clear that the significant gap between public statements and the reported negotiating positions means any positive outcome remains contingent on resolving deep underlying disagreements — and that substantial uncertainty persists over the direction these talks will ultimately take.

{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “Singapore Declares Pro-ASEAN Neutrality at Security Forum”, “description”: “Singapore’s Chan Chun Sing declared ASEAN is neither pro-China nor pro-US at the 2026 Shangri-La Dialogue, amid rising US-China rivalry and regional defence shifts.”, “datePublished”: “2026-05-31T09:42:09Z”, “dateModified”: “2026-05-31T09:42:09Z”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/singapore-pro-asean-neutrality-shangri-la-dialogue”, “author”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”, “logo”: {“@type”: “ImageObject”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/logo.png”}}, “mainEntityOfPage”: {“@type”: “WebPage”, “@id”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/singapore-pro-asean-neutrality-shangri-la-dialogue”}, “articleSection”: “Indo-Pacific Security”, “keywords”: [“Singapore”, “ASEAN”, “Shangri-La Dialogue”, “Chan Chun Sing”, “US-China rivalry”, “Indo-Pacific”, “South China Sea”, “BrahMos”, “neutrality”, “defence policy”], “about”: [{“@type”: “Thing”, “name”: “ASEAN”}, {“@type”: “Thing”, “name”: “Shangri-La Dialogue”}, {“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Chan Chun Sing”}], “mentions”: [{“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Chan Chun Sing”}, {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “ASEAN”}, {“@type”: “Place”, “name”: “Singapore”}, {“@type”: “Place”, “name”: “South China Sea”}], “wordCount”: 432, “inLanguage”: “en”}

Singapore Declares Pro-ASEAN Neutrality at Security Forum

What Happened

Singapore Education Minister Chan Chun Sing told the 2026 Shangri-La Dialogue that Singapore and ASEAN are neither pro-China nor pro-US, but pro-ASEAN. The declaration drew applause at the high-profile security forum, which serves as a primary venue for Indo-Pacific security signalling. Chan’s remarks were made explicitly in the context of intensifying US-China rivalry, positioning Singapore — and by extension ASEAN — as a bloc committed to its own collective interests rather than alignment with either great power.

Why It Matters

The statement carries considerable policy weight on several fronts. Singapore holds significant diplomatic influence within ASEAN, meaning a formal articulation of ASEAN-first neutrality from one of its most prominent members shapes how the broader bloc frames its collective posture toward both Washington and Beijing. The Shangri-La Dialogue is not an incidental venue: it is a primary platform for Indo-Pacific security signalling, lending Chan’s remarks an outsized resonance beyond the conference hall.

The declaration has direct implications for trade agreements, defence arrangements, and regional institution-building across Southeast Asia. Separately, the Philippines has identified Beijing as the main hurdle to a South China Sea code of conduct, underscoring the live tensions against which Singapore’s neutrality statement lands. This context sits alongside earlier signals from ASEAN chief warnings that US-China de-escalation is vital for the region and ASEAN ministers reaffirming trade corridor pledges.

What Might Happen

According to Defence Security Asia, Vietnam is joining India’s BrahMos missile network and Indonesia is nearing a similar deal — developments that suggest individual ASEAN members may be hedging through bilateral defence partnerships even as the bloc publicly espouses non-alignment. Analysts cited by Mothership suggest the applause Chan received at the Shangri-La Dialogue reflects genuine regional appetite for the pro-ASEAN framing, but the durability of that consensus could be tested as US-China competition intensifies.

If individual member states continue to pursue separate defence arrangements — such as the BrahMos agreements reported by Defence Security Asia — the gap between ASEAN’s collective neutrality posture and its members’ individual security calculations may widen. Whether Singapore’s declared framework can hold the bloc together under that pressure is a question regional governments and analysts are likely to scrutinise closely in the months ahead.

{}

Nigeria Governors Propose N100,000 Minimum Wage

What Happened

Nigerian state governors have proposed a new national minimum wage of N100,000, according to Channels Television and Nigeria Info FM. The proposal emerged from active tripartite negotiations involving the federal government, state governors, and organised labour unions. Senior official AbdulRazaq confirmed to Vanguard News that all three parties — the federal government, governors, and labour — are currently at the table negotiating the N100,000 figure. As of reporting on 30 May 2026, no final agreement has been announced.

Why It Matters

Nigeria’s national minimum wage is a central instrument of labour and social policy, with its level directly affecting millions of formal-sector workers across the country. The proposed N100,000 figure represents a significant upward revision and comes against a backdrop of persistent inflationary pressure that has steadily eroded real wages. The outcome of these negotiations carries substantial fiscal implications for state governments, many of which have historically struggled to meet their existing wage obligations. A new, higher wage floor would require those governments to reassess their payroll commitments and budget allocations.

What Might Happen

According to Channels Television, negotiations remain ongoing and no final figure has been agreed upon, meaning the process could extend further before a resolution is reached. Vanguard News reports that AbdulRazaq confirmed all parties are still actively negotiating, suggesting the N100,000 proposal may yet be subject to revision. Nigeria Info FM notes that governors are still considering the figure, indicating that even the proposing parties have not fully committed to the number. Should labour unions judge the N100,000 proposal insufficient relative to current inflation levels, the active negotiation dynamic suggests the process could face resistance that might prolong talks. If the three parties fail to converge on a mutually acceptable figure, the negotiation timeline may extend, delaying any new wage floor from taking effect.

{}

IMF Warns Argentina Over Corruption and Transparency

What Happened

The International Monetary Fund has issued a sharp warning to the Argentine government over what it described as weak anti-corruption efforts and significant delays in asset declaration requirements. Reported by multiple Argentine outlets on 30 May 2026, the IMF assessment flagged deficiencies in patrimonial controls and raised broader concerns about transparency in public governance. According to Perfil, the Fund specifically criticised Argentina’s failure to meet declaraciones juradas obligations — formal asset disclosure requirements for public officials. La Gaceta further reported that the IMF questioned the government’s anti-corruption policy and warned of failures in patrimonial oversight. Los Primeros TV described the Fund’s communication as a harsh warning over corruption and a lack of transparency.

Why It Matters

The IMF’s assessment carries substantial policy weight. Argentina remains reliant on Fund support to manage its debt obligations, meaning governance failures identified in programme reviews can directly affect the terms and timing of future disbursements. The warnings over patrimonial controls and asset declarations go beyond procedural concerns — they signal institutional weaknesses in public accountability at a moment when Argentina continues to face elevated inflation pressures and a fragile fiscal trajectory. When the IMF publicly flags anti-corruption deficiencies, it introduces a governance dimension into what are typically framed as purely fiscal negotiations, raising the stakes for the Argentine government’s reform agenda.

What Might Happen

According to Palermo Online Noticias, analysts suggest Argentina is accumulating what may amount to an unpayable debt burden, and the IMF’s posture could signal that the Fund is beginning to look the other way on debt sustainability concerns — a dynamic that might complicate future programme reviews. If the Argentine government does not address the transparency and patrimonial control deficiencies identified by the Fund, tighter conditionality in upcoming disbursement rounds could follow, according to the framing provided by sources in the pool. No specific timeline for corrective measures has been publicly announced by the Argentine government, meaning the path toward compliance remains uncertain. Analysts cited across the reporting pool suggest that mounting scrutiny over governance failures may further weigh on investor confidence, which could in turn affect Argentina’s broader fiscal trajectory if left unaddressed.

{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “ECOWAS, AfDB Moves Aim to Deepen African Trade”, “description”: “ECOWAS pushes to operationalise its Business Council as AfDB extends a $20 million trade finance guarantee to Zambia, with AfCFTA gender inclusion also advancing.”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/ecowas-afdb-deepen-african-trade/”, “datePublished”: “2026-05-30T09:16:54Z”, “dateModified”: “2026-05-30T09:16:54Z”, “author”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”, “logo”: {“@type”: “ImageObject”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/logo.png”}}, “mainEntityOfPage”: {“@type”: “WebPage”, “@id”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/ecowas-afdb-deepen-african-trade/”}, “articleSection”: “Trade Policy”, “keywords”: [“ECOWAS”, “AfDB”, “African trade”, “AfCFTA”, “trade finance”, “Zambia”, “Aliko Dangote”, “West Africa”, “economic integration”, “women traders”], “about”: [{“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “Economic Community of West African States”, “alternateName”: “ECOWAS”}, {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “African Development Bank”, “alternateName”: “AfDB”}, {“@type”: “Thing”, “name”: “African Continental Free Trade Area”, “alternateName”: “AfCFTA”}], “citation”: [{“@type”: “CreativeWork”, “name”: “ECOWAS Moves To Strengthen Regional Trade As Dangote, Commission Push Business Council Operationalisation”, “url”: “https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixAFBVV95cUxPdV9mbHNfVmM2b3pUN1F0WEFpLVA4Y19MaFpqTDVZY1IxQVJoZldVd1Q1UVFvNkxNS2VBTzJMMnJDSXE1MHlXdzlLcTQ0YzMyOFNzdDR3YlFkdkxPbW1XSXVwbjU5RnhKNXJIa095Sk1DVXFKUWtIVXhDV0QxNl9XVVlnQlU0a0prVld4YXhvLXJTdl9kazJRSFNlX0Ywek5kdnQ4R”}]}

{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “ASEAN Chief: US-China De-escalation Vital for Region”, “description”: “ASEAN’s Secretary-General calls US-China de-escalation crucial for Southeast Asia at the Shangri-La Dialogue, as defence ministers push military cooperation.”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/asean-chief-us-china-de-escalation-vital-region/”, “datePublished”: “2026-05-30T09:13:12Z”, “dateModified”: “2026-05-30T09:13:12Z”, “author”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Policy Dispatch”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com”, “logo”: {“@type”: “ImageObject”, “url”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/wp-content/uploads/logo.png”}}, “mainEntityOfPage”: {“@type”: “WebPage”, “@id”: “https://thepolicydispatch.com/asean-chief-us-china-de-escalation-vital-region/”}, “articleSection”: “Asia-Pacific Security”, “keywords”: [“ASEAN”, “US-China relations”, “Shangri-La Dialogue”, “Southeast Asia”, “military cooperation”, “Erdogan”, “Tu00fcrkiye”, “Iran”, “Pakistan”, “great-power rivalry”, “Asia-Pacific”], “about”: [{“@type”: “Event”, “name”: “Shangri-La Dialogue”, “description”: “Annual Asia-Pacific security forum at which ASEAN’s Secretary-General and Defence Ministers made key statements on US-China tensions and regional military cooperation.”}], “citation”: [{“@type”: “CreativeWork”, “name”: “Moves by US and China to ease tensions crucial for S-E Asia, says ASEAN chief”, “url”: “https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwgFBVV95cUxOZkRON0t2LXlKQ2xRNEg1VWxzZklFSVFIMFczQ21CSlg5eXg3UkRZOUI0cV81SjU5WlZHRmZYMVpXLUVvc0NTWEhhZWZlMXhjYjBSTGM5VE9oa2Fndjd5bXFpTUlRSmVXRERhcEYxWmREQkFkbEkxNUtLbTBGZzcxd0ZiampMNDlFQ0tBeDh2X3VoYVZYMkJQWHY2cVpVdGlaZWJobGJSdWdvOXRPZmt0Y0M5QUplY0VOX3NvT0pOSVJ0UQ”}, {“@type”: “CreativeWork”, “name”: “ASEAN Defence Ministers Push For Greater Military Cooperation At Shangri-La Dialogue”, “url”: “https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWEFVX3lxTE1rSnR0X3NtM1VjMUR3Nm9fX05BWm9HR1JoOE8xY2VOWlBtanVqdUgxcnh4M19RcnNodkF3TWJyeGhYZ1BoeVo3SFRKZC1rWXVpY0dwanhCMmI”}, {“@type”: “CreativeWork”, “name”: “Erdogan tells Iran and Pakistan: Turkiye stands ready to support peace amid regional conflict”, “url”: “https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWEFVX3lxTE1ZbDhzYkR4VDQ2alZGakE1bW9YT1dtRTF0Y0d6czE1WHpFN0NvM0JFTzl6aE9DU2VNVXZmUFVFaTJITHpVbHU2S0pIcGQxb1JIbmF3WVYybXA”}]}